[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-durand-dual-stack-lite-00 general comments

To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-durand-dual-stack-lite-00 general comments
From: Rémi Denis-Courmont <rdenis@simphalempin.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:43:24 +0300
In-reply-to: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0807272012520.1915@netcore.fi>
Organization: Remlab.net
References: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0807272012520.1915@netcore.fi>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.9

On Sunday 27 July 2008 20:25:15 Pekka Savola, you wrote:
> Nit: It's not clear why Section 4.1 suggests using 0.0.0.1 as source
> address.  The CPE box is going to have some address on the LAN
> interface and it could just as well use that.

By the way, my Ubuntu PC refuses to accept 0.0.0.1 as a valid address. I 
reckon the same operating system is found in certain CPEs.

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
Maemo Software, Nokia Devices R&D

Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft-durand-dual-stack-lite-00 general comments
  - From: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>

References:
- draft-durand-dual-stack-lite-00 general comments
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-00 comments
Next by Date: Re: draft-durand-dual-stack-lite-00 general comments
Previous by thread: draft-durand-dual-stack-lite-00 general comments
Next by thread: Re: draft-durand-dual-stack-lite-00 general comments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread