At 12:03 p.m. 18/08/2008, Rémi Després wrote:
In my Webster dictionary - 10th edition: "tending to hinder the attainment of a desired goal", the goal being here sucessful IPv6 deployment ;-).On 18 aug 2008, at 11:46, Rémi Després wrote:Fixing the problem for IPv6 may be worth the pain, but fixing it for IPv4 (the only subject of my comment) would IMO be counterproductive.Counterproductive?
So you basically argue that keeping problems in IPv4 (on which the current infrastructure depends) would be a driver for v6?
Wouldn't be a better goal to have some many interesting features in v6 that nobody could resist deploying it?
(I must admit it is not the first time that I hear this type of argument, though... )
Kind regards, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1