| we have been running a WGLC on this. We have gotten comments I have seen from the Security Directorate and from Remi. My plan right now is to let Krishnan update his draft accordingly and get agreement from those who commented and then mail the two in. Anyone else that wishes to comment, now would be a good time.
I was going to start a WGLC on the Rogue RA work this coming week. I asked for review from SecDir, 6man, and Ops Area, and the SecDir reviews have called for further work. So we will wait on that WGLC until the authors have the issues on the table sorted out. On Aug 7, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Fred Baker wrote: I have no idea what is going on here. I sent this on Monday, but have not received it back from the list. Apologies in advance if you see a duplicate. Begin forwarded message: Date: August 4, 2008 4:22:05 PM JST Subject: Teredo and Tunneling WGLC
This is to initiate a two week working group last call of two documents.
"Teredo Security Updates", Dave Thaler, Suresh Krishnan, James Hoagland, 14-Jul-08, <draft-krishnan-v6ops-teredo-update-03.txt>
"Teredo Extensions", Dave Thaler, 14-Jul-08, <draft-thaler-v6ops-teredo-extensions-01.txt> Please read them now. If you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or finding additional issues that need to be addressed, please post your comments to the list.
We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the documents as well as their content. If you have read the documents and believe them to be of operational utility, that is also an important comment to make.
|