[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: But are we talking IPv6 only? That's how I read the draft. (Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03)

To: Mark Smith <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>
Subject: Re: But are we talking IPv6 only? That's how I read the draft. (Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:12:28 -0700
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <20080827194713.23271bd1.ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>
References: <20080824204553.08131c65.ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org> <48B1CCE8.1070305@gmail.com> <01af01c9065b$b4602440$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <48B23391.1090503@gmail.com> <01cd01c90672$a57c8790$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <48B31DA3.6080001@gmail.com> <07d201c906f7$50a85e30$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <48B32B43.5010103@gmail.com> <084c01c906fe$f9bf1840$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <48B33430.40704@gmail.com> <A31EB889-2BD9-4283-A408-AB6DCC1D568A@suspicious.org> <08be01c90712$d876cd40$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <20080827194713.23271bd1.ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>

On Aug 27, 2008, at 03:17, Mark Smith wrote:

* Native IPv6 CPE security, plus IPv4 security/functionality
requirements to support IPv6 transition via IPv4 tunnelling

It was my understanding that this is the proper scope, not thealternatives you mentioned.



--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering

Follow-Ups:
- RE: But are we talking IPv6 only? That's how I read the draft. (Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03)
  - From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
- Re: But are we talking IPv6 only? That's how I read the draft. (Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03)
  - From: Mark Smith <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>

References:
- Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
  - From: Mark Smith <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>
- Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- RE: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
  - From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
- Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- RE: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
  - From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
- Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- RE: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
  - From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
- Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- RE: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
  - From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
- Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
  - From: Truman Boyes <truman@suspicious.org>
- RE: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
  - From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
- But are we talking IPv6 only? That's how I read the draft. (Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03)
  - From: Mark Smith <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
Next by Date: RE: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03
Previous by thread: RE: But are we talking IPv6 only? That's how I read the draft. (Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03)
Next by thread: Re: But are we talking IPv6 only? That's how I read the draft. (Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread