[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: new version of the CPE Rtr draft is ready for review
Brief summary of what we closed with reviewers in this -03
version.
1. Closed the new text in the mcast section with Remi - see
new section in the -03 draft.
2. Closed with Francois-Xavier for null route with
following text added to the IPv6 Data Forwarding section:
A route SHOULD be added to the routing table (to prevent
routing
loops) that is lower priority than any route except the
default
route. The choice to drop the packet or send an
ICMPv6 Destination
Unreachable to the source address of the
packet is implementation-
dependent. The installation of
the null route MAY be automatic.
Also closed on bridged mcast with following
text:
If the CPE Router hardware includes a network bridge between
the WAN
interface and the LAN interface(s), then the CPE Router
MUST support
MLDv2 snooping as per
[RFC4541].
3. Closed with Shin Miyakawa with the following
text:
Added following text to the end of the
"Unnumbered Model" section:
"The unnumbered
model is incompatible with the strong host
model
on the CPE router. The unnumbered
model may be inappropriate for
use with
certain broadband deployments where a device that
uses
the strong host model can operate as a
CPE Router."
4. Fred Baker requested us to add an IPv4 section - we
complied by adding a short IPv4 section that describes current
practice but does not mandate anything.
5.
Brian Carpenter was right. We added a 6to4 section to the draft - he had
asked for such support at the beginning,
For other closures,
please see the Change-log for this version.
Hemant & Wes
Thanks.
Hemant &
Wes