Re: [BEHAVE] Comments on the NAT66 draft

[Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>]

Margaret Wasserman   (1-12/1-31/200x) 11/6/08 9:38 PM:
> Hosting this discussion on the behave WG mailing list is certainly not 
> an attempt to avoid folks in v6ops having feedback on the work, it is 
> just that behave seems like the right place to work on the actual 
> specification.  With all of the v4v6 translation discussion happening 
> in behave, I think we've been hoping that the v6 folks will show up in 
> behave and have this discussion, and do this work, there.

> Personally, though, I'd rather that we discuss this in one forum 
> (behave) and that interested people bring their thoughts, opinions and 
> feedback to that forum.
Same opinion.
RD