Hi,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:16:29AM +0100, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote:
> [ DHCPv6 makes renumbering easy, but... ]
>
> For end-systems statefull addressing could aid, however what about BGP
> sessions, addressing of network elements, access-lists, firewalls,
> etc... These will require manual handling and if realizing some networks
> count +10k network devices the operational overhead involved is not to
> be deminished.
Full agreement. This is the sort of issues I had in mind where renumbering
might not be *that* easy.
(Just to avoid confusion. When I mentioned customers asking for IPv6 PI
or NAT66 "solutions", this wasn't speaking about purely consumer-style
end users. For those, I see no benefit in either approaches)
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
Attachment:
pgpUXc819q4m1.pgp
Description: PGP signature