[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Load Balancing for Mobile IP
- To: "luowanming" <luowanming@cnnic.cn>
- Subject: Re: Load Balancing for Mobile IP
- From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:04:32 -0700
- Cc: "Mark Smith" <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>, "IPv6 Operations" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, "mext-chairs" <mext-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "mip4-chairs" <mip4-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "Kurt Erik Lindqvist" <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, "RonBonica" <rbonica@juniper.net>, "mext-ads" <mext-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-luo-v6ops-6man-shim6-lbam" <draft-luo-v6ops-6man-shim6-lbam@tools.ietf.org>
- In-reply-to: <437903642.25246@cnnic.cn>
- References: <A16EEC0B-822C-44BA-B875-0D9AA6BE7A00@cisco.com>, <49C7FB72.5020104@it.uc3m.es>, <0C2F04C3-1091-4C82-9F10-0F0675508A93@cisco.com>, <49C80401.1040809@it.uc3m.es>, <A9295D76-089E-49E3-BF91-573AA668D8DF@cisco.com>, <49C80678.6080508@it.uc3m.es>, <5801C1F3-B267-41EC-8A44-11C6A419851F@cisco.com>, <437894020.05666@cnnic.cn> <437903642.25246@cnnic.cn>
On Mar 24, 2009, at 7:07 AM, luowanming wrote:
So, what is the next step for this draft? Maybe it needs some
modifications according to comments? or move to mext WG? or jointly
worked by v6ops and Mobile IP?
In this context, I would expect v6ops to provide a problem statement,
and mext to provide a solution. I think Mark summarized the problem
statement, although Marcello may want it in more detail. In my
opinion, the logical next step for a proposed solution is discussion
in mext.