draft-jiang-incremental-CGN (was: RE: Agenda)

["Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>]

Had intended to say this at the mike, but I would like
to see this work taken as a wg item. Reason is that I
see a continued need for IPv4 clients to access IPv4
and IPv6 servers. Can we have this as a wg item?

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sheng Jiang [mailto:shengjiang@huawei.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 6:29 PM
> To: 'Fred Baker'; 'IPv6 Operations'
> Cc: 'Brian E Carpenter'
> Subject: RE: Agenda
> 
> Hi, Fred,
> 
> Could you add Brian Carpenter as co-author and presenter for the
following agenda
> item? Due to a known bug of auto-submission tool, Brian's name does
not recognized.
> 
> An Incremental Carrier-Grade NAT (CGN) for IPv6 Transition
> Sheng Jiang, Dayong Guo, Brian Carpenter
> 
> Many thanks and best regards,
> 
> Sheng
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> >[mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> >Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:55 AM
> >To: IPv6 Operations
> >Subject: Agenda
> >
> >So I am finally posting the agenda for our meetings next week.
> >I'll blame the delay on the late posting of drafts. Or
> >something like that :-)
> >
> >     http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09mar/agenda/v6ops.html
> >
> >I need all of the presentations that people plan to use,
> >whether in PDF or PPT format, by Sunday night so I can post
> >them, please. We will run them from my laptop.
> >
> >Presenters, some of you have told me you only need ten
> >minutes, and I'll be hoping you do that. I asked for two
> >2-hour sessions and got one 2.5 hour and one 1 hour session.
> >There is at least one discussion that I expect to warrant some
> >extra time, and what we have is about 20 minutes each.
> >
>