[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-04 WGLC



Please do in your next revision. I think he argument holds. Barring updates as the result of last call comments, I don't think the setting in the draft is critical, though. The important point is not whether you mark it as standards vs informational tracks; it's what the IESG decides.

On Apr 15, 2009, at 4:32 PM, james woodyatt wrote:

On Apr 15, 2009, at 09:53, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:

As I requested earlier, this draft should be changed form BCP to Informational.

If the Working Group chair(s) direct me to change the category, then I'll change it.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering