Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-04 WGLC

[Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>]

Please do in your next revision. I think he argument holds. Barring  
updates as the result of last call comments, I don't think the setting  
in the draft is critical, though. The important point is not whether  
you mark it as standards vs informational tracks; it's what the IESG  
decides.

On Apr 15, 2009, at 4:32 PM, james woodyatt wrote:

> On Apr 15, 2009, at 09:53, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
> > As I requested earlier, this draft should be changed form BCP to  
> > Informational.
>
> If the Working Group chair(s) direct me to change the category, then  
> I'll change it.
>
>
> --
> james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
> member of technical staff, communications engineering