Re: I-D Action:draft-kawamura-ipv6-text-representation-01.txt

[Seiichi Kawamura <kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Brian, All

Thanks for the comment!

> As I understand it, this draft defines a canonical form
> of address representation and recommends that it be used
> to minimise human confusion.

yes. exactly.

> That isn't a bad idea, but IMHO we need a clear statement
> that humans and algorithms SHOULD generate this format,
> and that all implementations MUST accept any legitimate
> RFC4291 format.

That was sort of my intention with the phrase
"The recommendation in this document is one that,
complies fully with RFC 4291..." (Section 4.)
but maybe I was a bit vague.

It would be nice to hear more thoughts on the draft.

Thanks,
Seiichi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFJ7pAfcrhTYfxyMkIRAvXSAJ9m7igwzO/j7YwI3UgxcsBFzgtjZACgjctC
jN+gU6+P2pvILCdtdnLvCs8=
=Fggu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----