RE: New Version Notification for draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn

["Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rémi Després [mailto:remi.despres@free.fr]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 2:30 AM
> To: Sheng Jiang
> Cc: Templin, Fred L; 'Brian E Carpenter'; v6ops@ops.ietf.org; guoseu@huawei.com; Fleischman, Eric;
> Russert, Steven W
> Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn
> 
> Sheng Jiang  -  le (m/j/a) 5/15/09 4:12 AM:
> 
> > However, our draft does no intend to make judge of 6rd, or other tunnel
> > techonogies. We actually would like to list serveral suitable tunnel
> > techonogies with brief introductions in order to complete our puzzle. As we
> > ready state in the draft, "ISATAP or VET are also be considered." Actually,
> > one thing we can do for next version is to expand this section a little bit,
> > to include brief introductions for Auto GRE, ISATAP and VET. However, we
> > also think 6rd is suitable and do not want to rule it out.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> As far as I know, among ISATAP, VET, and 6rd,  the latter is the only
> one to have been actually deployed on a large scale, offering native
> IPv6 to millions of customer sites. It deserves IMHO to be understood as
> such.

Hmm, ISATAP is in all of our Windows PCs right now and
has been for years. Various other proprietary and public
domain implementations support it as well. Various sites
use it, but its hard to know which ones because it all
just looks like IPv6 when it comes out of the site. I
hear that it is used fairly extensively in China, and
also in large corporate enterprise networks.

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

> More details in:
> http://rosie.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-
> 58/presentations/uploads//presentations/Tuesday/Plenary%2011:00/Cassen-IPv6_at_Free.wWE6.pdf
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> RD