[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Simple Security - Layered Filtering should be in the document



Hi Gregory,

Yes, I will be happy to help. I suspect though that this cannot be optional,
if we assume that all (most?) transition mechanisms will use tunnel
mechanisms. In other words, if you enable tunnel traffic by default, you
should have security for this traffic, by default. 

Thanks,
	Yaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Gregory M. Lebovitz
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:37
> To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Fwd: Simple Security - Layered Filtering should be in the
> document
> 
> 
> >
> >James,
> >Layered filtering should be included in the document. It is an OPTION
> >that people really need in an environment where the use of tunneling is
> >growing rapidly. I would appreciate it if others who agree would ack
> >this email to the list.
> >
> >I volunteer to write the text needed to achieve this. I believe Yaron
> >Shaffer would help as well.
> >
> >Gregory.
> >
> >+++++++++++++++++++++++
> >IETF-related email from
> >Gregory M. Lebovitz
> >Juniper Networks
> >g r e go r  y d o t  i e tf a t  g m a i l  do t c o  m
> 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> IETF-related email from
> Gregory M. Lebovitz
> Juniper Networks
> g r e go r  y d o t  i e tf a t  g m a i l  do t c o  m
> 
> 
> 
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature