Re: Simple Security - Layered Filtering should be in the document

On 30 jul 2009, at 16:53, Yaron Sheffer wrote:

For the sake of argument, if *all* the current <something>-in-IPv6proposals
are standardized, then presumably they *will* go into mainstream OSes.


So whenever there's a new protocol there must be a new filter?

Isn't it simpler for the hosts that don't want to receive certainpackets to not run the protocol?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simple Security - Layered Filtering should be in the document
  - From: "Gregory M. Lebovitz" <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
- RE: Simple Security - Layered Filtering should be in the document
  - From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>

References:
- Fwd: Simple Security - Layered Filtering should be in the document
  - From: "Gregory M. Lebovitz" <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
- Re: Fwd: Simple Security - Layered Filtering should be in the document
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Re: Fwd: Simple Security - Layered Filtering should be in the document
  - From: "Gregory M. Lebovitz" <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
- Re: Simple Security - Layered Filtering should be in the document
  - From: Shane Amante <shane@castlepoint.net>
- Re: Simple Security - Layered Filtering should be in the document
  - From: "Gregory M. Lebovitz" <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
- Re: Simple Security - Layered Filtering should be in the document
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
- RE: Simple Security - Layered Filtering should be in the document
  - From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>