On 4/08/2009, at 3:15 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Mark Baugher <mbaugher@cisco.com>:Letting malware use UPnP NAT traversal or NAT-PMP as done today is a pretty low standard for a CPE interface that IMHO weshould not accept going forward. We'd like the CPE to refuse commandsfrom malware.What's the difference between a user and malware?
I just posted replied to another note regarding this. Mark
Mark