[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: I-D Action:draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis-00.txt
Brian -
We agree with your new text and will include it in the next version.
- Hemant & Wes
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 12:17 AM
To: IPv6 Operations
Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis-00.txt
> 4.3. 6to4 Automated Tunneling (MEDIUM)/Dual-Stack Lite (DEV)/ISATAP
> (MEDIUM)
>
> If the IPv4 address assigned to the WAN interface of the CPE Router
> is a non-[RFC1918] IPv4 address, and the CPE Router fails to
acquire
> an IPv6 address before WAN_IP_ACQUIRE_TIMEOUT seconds after
acquiring
> the IPv4 address, then the 6to4 tunneling protocol [RFC3056] SHOULD
> be enabled automatically, allowing tunneling of IPv6 packets over
> IPv4 without requiring user configuration. If an anycast 6to4
server
> cannot be located, the CPE Router MAY initiate ISATAP [RFC4214] to
> establish IPv6 connectivity over the IPv4 network.
This is slightly wrong IMHO. Firstly we should be clear that the CPE is
to behave like a 6to4 router as defined in 3056. Secondly, 3056 does not
define the anycast method; in fact it assumes that a unicast address is
configured for the nearest 6to4 relay (*not* "server"). So, let me
rephrase this:
... then 6to4 router behavior [RFC3056] SHOULD
be enabled automatically, allowing tunneling of IPv6 packets over
IPv4 without requiring user configuration. Note that [RFC3056] relies
on configuration of an IPv4 address for a 6to4 relay router. The CPE
SHOULD allow this, but also SHOULD by default use the anycast method
defined in [RFC3068]. If a 6to4 relay router cannot be contacted,
the CPE router MAY initiate ISATAP ...
Brian