Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-02

[Martin Pels <martin.pels@ams-ix.net>]

Hi,

On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 23:25:37 -0300
Roque Gagliano <roque@lacnic.net> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I issued a new ID of the draft with the changes that came up at the  
> Stockholm meeting. Changes were:
> - I explained why ULA is not a good idea.
> - I added that addressing can use two different /48, one for the
> LANs and the second one for the internal services and not necessarily
> one / 47, as comments at the meeting.

In section 3 you added the following: "IPv6 prefixes for IXP LAN's are
typically publicly well known.".

I suggest changing this to something like: "IPv6 prefixes for IXP LANs
are typically taken from dedicated IPv6 blocks for IXP assignments,
reserved for this purpose by the different RIRs."

Kind regards,
Martin