Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-02

On Sep 9, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Roque Gagliano wrote:

Hi,

I issued a new ID of the draft with the changes that came up at the Stockholm meeting. Changes were:
- I explained why ULA is not a good idea.
- I added that addressing can use two different /48, one for the LANs and the second one for the internal services and not necessarily one /47, as comments at the meeting.
- I included comments from Nick Hilliar about BGP sessions.
- I added text about having different participants in different solocited-node multicast group.
- I mention of RA-Guard based on comments from Nick Hilliar.

I will now request Alain and Bernard to review the doc as they are the WG volunteers.

attached is a .doc version with my comments

hope this helps

--alain

Regards,

Roque.

Begin forwarded message:

From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmission@ietf.org>
Date: September 8, 2009 11:00:14 PM GMT-03:00
To: roque@lacnic.net
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-02

A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-02.txt has been successfuly submitted by Roque Gagliano and posted to the IETF repository.

Filename: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp
Revision: 02
Title: IPv6 Deployment in Internet Exchange Points (IXPs)
Creation_date: 2009-09-08
WG ID: v6ops
Number_of_pages: 10

Abstract:
This document provides a guide for IPv6 deployment in Internet
Exchange Points (IXP). It includes information regarding the switch
fabric configuration, the addressing plan and general organizational
tasks to be performed. IXPs are mainly a layer 2 infrastructure and
in many case the best recommendations state that the IPv6 data,
control and management plane should not be handled differently than
in IPv4.

The IETF Secretariat.

-------------------------------------------------------------
Roque Gagliano
LACNIC
roque@lacnic.net
GPG Fingerprint: E929 06F4 D8CD 2AD8 9365 DB72 9E4F 964A 01E9 6CEE