>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:
owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:
owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 6:21 PM
>> To: IPv6 Operations
>> Subject: Re: Agenda call
>>
>> The authors wanted to ask about this at the last IETF meeting, and the
>> discussion around the document told me that it wasn't ready for
>> working group status.
>>
>> Opinions at this point? Does this document represent something the
>> working group wants to take on?
>
>I reviewed the document, and IMHO it is stable enough
>and relevant enough to take on as a wg item.
>
>Fred
>
fred.l.templin@boeing.com>
>> On Oct 7, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>
>> > I'm not sure if Sheng is back on line, so let me say
>> > that we want to propose WG adoption of
>> > draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn-03.txt
>> >
>> > It's been updated according to comments received by
>> > September 25. We could describe those updates in a short
>> > agenda slot.
>> >
>> > Brian
>> >
>> > On 2009-10-08 04:54, Fred Baker wrote:
>> >> We have two sessions scheduled in Hiroshima. This is a call for
>> >> agenda
>> >> items. Who wants time to talk?
>> >>
>> >>
>>