[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-02.txt
Michael,
thanks, we'll incorporate your comments into the next version.
cheers,
Ole
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Michael Newbery <newbery@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 27/10/2009, at 10:45 AM, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the
>> IETF.
>>
>>
>> Title : Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers
>> Author(s) : H. Singh, et al.
>> Filename : draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-02.txt
>> Pages : 14
>> Date : 2009-10-26
>
>
>
>
>> IPv6 Neighbor Discovery and DHCP protocols operate over any type of
>> IPv6 supported link-layer and there is no need for a link-layer
>> specific configuration protocol for IPv6 network layer configuration
>> options like what's e.g. in PPP IPCP for IPv4. This section makes
>
> "e.g." is superfluous
> options like what's in PPP IPCP for IPv4. This section makes
> or better
> options, as is in PPP IPCP for IPv4. This section makes
>
>> G-2: The IPV6 CE router SHOULD support the following RFCs:
>>
>> * Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification [RFC2460]
>>
>> * Stateless Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Service
>> for IPv6 [RFC3736]
>>
>> * Default Router Preferences and More-Specific Routes
>> [RFC4191]
>>
>> * IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture [RFC4291]
>>
>> * IPv6 Subnet Model: the Relationship between Links and Subnet
>> Prefixes [I-D.ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model]
>
> SHOULD seems inappropriate. RFC2460 must be MUST, especially considering the
> immediately preceding
>>
>> G-1: An IPv6 CE router is an IPv6 node and MUST follow the IPv6 Node
>> Requirements [RFC4294] specification.
>
> since RFC4294 says
>>
>> The Internet Protocol Version 6 is specified in [RFC-2460]. This
>> specification MUST be supported.
>
>
>