[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-03.txt



>
>   WPD-1a:  The IPv6 CE router MUST support DHCP prefix delegation
>           requesting router behavior as specified in [RFC3633] (IA_PD
>           option).
>
>   WPD-1b:
>
>           (a)  The IPv6 CE router MUST support DHCP prefix delegation
>                requesting router behavior as specified in [RFC3633]
>                (IA_PD option).
>
>           (b)  The IPv6 CE router MAY indicate as a hint to the
>                delegating router the size of the prefix it requires.
>                If so, it MUST ask for a prefix large enough to assign
>                one /64 for each of its interfaces rounded up to the
>                nearest nibble and MUST be configurable to ask for more.
>                The IPv6 CE router MUST be prepared to accept a
>                delegated prefix size different from what is given in
>                the hint.
>

This may be getting a bit to fuzzy. I'd prefer something more along
the lines of the original statement. Assuming the intention is to
ensure that each IPv6 interface in the CE router can be configured
with a /64, should the requirement not be that the CE router does not
request (or hint for) a prefix that is too small? (without going into
saying how large it actually should be)

Maybe this has been discussed before, but what is the desired
behaviour of the CE router in case the delegated prefix actually is
too small to assign a /64 to each of its interfaces?

cheers, Eduard

>
>
> Best regards,
> Ole
>
>
>