Hi,
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 02:38:22PM +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Eduard Metz wrote:
>
> >With regard to WLL-1, should this not be " If the WAN interface supports
> >Ethernet encapsulation, then the IPv6 CE router MUST support IPv6 over
> >Ethernet [RFC2464] or IPv6 over PPP(oE) [RFC2516]" ?
>
> It should support BOTH then, not just one of them (which I think is the
> intention of the document in its current state).
What's wrong with a CPE that doesn't support PPPoE for IPv4? Wouldn't
it be acceptable then to not-support PPPoE for IPv6 either?
There might be "pure ethernet" CPEs out there, with no PPP stack in them
(my guess would be that cable CPEs do "Ethernet encapsulation/framing" but
not "PPPoE").
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 144438
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
Attachment:
pgp9AfYmNR0nC.pgp
Description: PGP signature