[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC

Cameron,


I would be very happy if we included the above point in the transition
draft section 4.4


That's certainly fine (and Fred has already submitted a new version).

I do believe that IPv6-only (with nat64) is an excellent approach for mobile
networks, and I hope we will soon see this in widespread commercial usage.


And this above point too.

The draft only includes a green field corporate LAN as the use case
for IPv6-only.... and testing.  I believe adding the above points will
add mobile IPv6-only APNs as another relevant use case, not for
special purpose sensor networks, but generic IPv6 capable phones with
NAT64 systems to access the Internet.

I am perfectly fine with saying that dual-stack is the default IETF
recommended strategy as long as we also say that with some
consideration  and qualifications IPv6-only can be just as capable.


OK -- then we are on the same page!


Thanks Jari.


Thank you.

Jari


Cameorn