[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Using eww instead of w3m for HTML mails?

To: wl-en@ml.gentei.org
Subject: Re: Using eww instead of w3m for HTML mails?
From: Christian Kruse <cjk@defunct.ch>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:57:56 +0200
In-reply-to: <20141021074512.31ABA726E02E@jugulator.defunced.de>
References: <20141021074512.31ABA726E02E@jugulator.defunced.de>
Reply-to: wl-en@ml.gentei.org
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.4 (x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

Hi,

urghs, sorry - this mail wasn't meant to be sent three times. There is
a bug with Wanderlust and Emacs 24.4 which led me into thinking that
the mail wasn't sent:

<https://github.com/wanderlust/wanderlust/issues/75>

Sorry!

Best regards,
--
Christian Kruse
http://ck.kennt-wayne.de/

Attachment: pgpIjmy65yVSL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature

References:
- Using eww instead of w3m for HTML mails?
  - From: Christian Kruse <cjk@defunct.ch>

Prev by Date: Using eww instead of w3m for HTML mails?
Next by Date: Re: Summary buffer, move forward on 'd'
Previous by thread: Using eww instead of w3m for HTML mails?
Next by thread: Using eww instead of w3m for HTML mails?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread