[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: best practices for wanderlust+gmail
At Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:59:28 +0000 (UTC),
John Owens <john_owens@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> There are terrific guides to setting up Wanderlust with Gmail. WhatI'm missing, though, is best practices for how to *use* Gmail withWanderlust given its differences from traditional IMAP. Any thoughtsfrom those who have been using it for a while would be appreciated.
> - Gmail uses labels not folders. How does this impact WL usage? Is it typical to use 'O' to set a label, possibly several labels, and then archive the message?
> - It seems popular to "archive" everything in Gmail (possibly after it's labeled). Do wl/Gmail users have a particular setup so that 'o' always goes to the archive, or another keystroke?
> - Searching (IMAP search) in one giant archive seems like a headache. Any setup that makes WL searching more tractable, or do users just turn to Gmail's (excellent) online search through their mail?
Hi John,
I can’t help much with your first two questions, but I can say that
recent changes to WL will allow better search with gmail by using
gmail’s query language. If you run a recent (git) version of WL, you
can try:
(add-to-list 'elmo-imap4-search-keys "x-gm-raw")
You can then send raw gmail searches to your “all mail” folder.
You might also find that my “wl-fastfind” library makes this a little easier:
https://gist.github.com/egh/46c6ced69402a92c0ec6
I am going to try to get this incorporated into the WL core soon.
best, Erik
--
Sent from my free software system <http://fsf.org/>.