[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RFC 1305

To: iesg@ietf.org, <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: RFC 1305
From: Stephen Casner <casner@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 19:27:24 -0800 (PST)
Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 21:21:22 -0800
Envelope-to: iesg-hack@psg.com
List-help: <mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: <iesg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:iesg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Why hasn't RFC 1305 (Network Time Protocol spec) advanced from Draft
Standard to Full Standard and assumed its reserved STD 12 slot?
Surely enough time has passed.

                                                        -- Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC 1305
  - From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Fwd: draft-ietf-idwg-idmef-xml
Next by Date: my e-mail
Previous by thread: Fwd: draft-ietf-idwg-idmef-xml
Next by thread: Re: RFC 1305
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread