Re: agenda error

[Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>]

On måndag, jan 6, 2003, at 21:54 Europe/Stockholm, Scott Bradner wrote:

> paf got on at the end of the call
Yes, but as Thomas say, we didn't discuss this document when I was on 
it.

My view is that we need myself and Steve.

   paf

> --
> From iesg-admin@ietf.org  Mon Jan  6 15:36:39 2003
> To: Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
> cc: iesg-secretary@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: agenda error
> In-Reply-To: Message from Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
>    of "Sun, 05 Jan 2003 11:07:13 EST." 
> <20030105160713.30E637B4D@berkshire.research.att.com>
> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 15:31:57 -0500
> From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
> Sender: iesg-admin@ietf.org
> Errors-To: iesg-admin@ietf.org
> X-BeenThere: iesg@ietf.org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
> Precedence: bulk
> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,
> 	<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Id: <iesg.ietf.org>
> List-Post: <mailto:iesg@ietf.org>
> List-Help: <mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,
> 	<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
>
> > Why is draft-ietf-idwg-idmef-xml-09.txt on the agenda?  (If I recall
> > correctly, it was erroneously on last week, too.)  It's not ready to
> > come back yet.
> My notes say paf wasn't on the call (at that time anyway) and we
> needed him to discuss.
>
> Thomas