[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-avt-smpte292-video - RTP Payload Format for SMPTE 292M Video to Proposed Standard
- To: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-avt-smpte292-video - RTP Payload Format for SMPTE 292M Video to Proposed Standard
- From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:49:30 -0500
- Cc: Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg@ietf.org>
In message <200301021948.OAA12592@ietf.org>, IESG Secretary writes:
>
>Last Call to expire on: 2002-12-31
>
> Please return the full line with your position.
>
> Yes No-Objection Discuss * Abstain
>
>
>Steve Bellovin [ ] [ X ] [ ] [ ]
But it's a bit odd to see a transport AD as an author of a protocol
with very high bandwidth and no possibility of congestion control.
Will this set an awkward precedent? ("My protocol is only for local
use, too!")
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)