Fwd: draft-jaffer-metric-interchange-format-03.txt

[Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>]

fwd of a fwd of an earlier decision by IESG and RFC-Editor. I don't 
think this caseshould be re-opened.

   paf


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
> Date: ons dec 25, 2002  08:46:15 Europe/Stockholm
> To: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Subject: Fwd: draft-jaffer-metric-interchange-format-03.txt
>
> I was not on the last call, so I don't know why I should review this 
> again.
>
> This was the decision by RFC-Editor after discussions between IESG and 
> IAB.
>
> I have the full thread if you want to have a copy.
>
>    paf
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> > Date: mån apr 8, 2002  20:12:03 Europe/Stockholm
> > To: agj@alum.mit.edu
> > Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org
> > Subject: draft-jaffer-metric-interchange-format-03.txt
> >
> > Aubrey,
> >
> > We apologize for the delayed response.  The RFC Editor has completed
> > the review of <draft-jaffer-metric-interchange-format-03.txt>.  We
> > cannot publish this document as an RFC, as we are the wrong standards
> > body for this type of publication.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > RFC Editor
> > From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> > Date: ons mar 27, 2002  00:51:46 Europe/Stockholm
> > To: iesg@ietf.org
> > Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> > Subject: Re: Experimental RFC to be: 
> > draft-jaffer-metric-interchange-format-03.txt
> > Reply-To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> >
> > IESG,
> >
> > We realize we have come to a deadlock regarding this document.  The 
> > RFC
> > Editor intends to resolve this issue by refusing to publish this
> > document, as we are the wrong standards body for this particular
> > publication.
> >
> > If we do not hear any objections to this within the next week, we will
> > proceed as stated above.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > RFC Editor