RE: FW: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

OK, Bob, sorry to have seen you as RFC-Editor here.
Maybe betetr to make that clear in your messages when
you do speak up on these matters... it is not always
100% clear to me.

But my story is equally true for IANA.

IANA has liason with IESG, and so whoever reads the IESG
mailing list info should have seen our discussions about it.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Braden [mailto:braden@ISI.EDU]
> Sent: woensdag 15 januari 2003 4:40
> To: iesg@ietf.org; bwijnen@lucent.com
> Cc: braden@ISI.EDU
> Subject: Re: FW: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to 
> Informational
> 
> 
> 
>   *> From bwijnen@lucent.com  Tue Jan 14 19:33:00 2003
>   *> From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
>   *> To: "Iesg (E-mail)" <iesg@ietf.org>
>   *> Cc: "Bob Braden (E-mail)" <braden@ISI.EDU>
>   *> Subject: FW: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to 
> Informational
>   *> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 04:32:45 +0100
>   *> MIME-Version: 1.0
>   *> X-AntiVirus: scanned by AMaViS 0.2.1
>   *> 
>   *> Bob Braden answers Kireeti:
>   *> 
>   *> >  *> If code points are to be allocated from the space 
> to be allocated by
>   *> >  *> IETF Consensus, I strongly suggest that a 
> *Standards Track* document be
>   *> >  *> written, with more detail on the messages, 
> especially their processing.
>   *> >
>   *> > Indeed, that is what "IETF consensus" means, isn't it?
>   *> >
>   *> >
>   *> > Bob Braden
>   *> 
>   *> Now I thought that we (IESG) recently discussed this and 
> that we agreed
>   *> that "IETF consensus" only means that we IETF Last Call 
> the document,
>   *> and not that it MUST be stds track or bcp.
>   *> 
>   *> It would be good if we clear this up and if RFC-Editor 
> would at least say
>   *> the same as we do.
>   *> 
>   *> Bert
>   *> 
> 
> Bert,
> 
> Note that this has absolutely nothing to do with the RFC Editor.  It
> is an IANA function.  I am involved with my IANA-expert-on-RSVP hat.
> 
> If the IESG in their collective wisdom modifies the meaning of terms,
> they need to inform all those involved with the IANA.
> 
> Bob
>