This is to request that the IESG review and reverse its decision to approve the document draft-chiba-radius-dynamic-authorization-05.txt for publication as an Informational RFC. This draft allocates new RADIUS packet type codes (40-45). RFC 2865 states in section 6.2, however, that "Because a new Packet Type has considerable impact on interoperability, a new Packet Type Code requires Standards Action...". I suppose that a case could be made for "grandfathering in" these type codes if they had been registered w/IANA under either RFC 2058 or RFC 2138 (both of which lacked an IANA Considerations section), but the type codes in question have apparently never been registered with IANA at all (see http://www.iana.org/assignments/radius-types). Thank you for your attention to this matter. ~gwz "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither..." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759