I agree with Bert suggestion to have the same statement as that in Bala and Zhi drafts.
Regards;
Osama Aboul-Magd
ATI Strategic Standards and Protocols
Nortel Networks
P.O. Box 3511, Station C
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
K1Y-4H7
Tel: +1 613 763 5827
e.mail:osama@nortelnetworks.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:32 PM
To: Aboul-Magd, Osama [CAR:1A00:EXCH]
Cc: Steve Trowbridge (E-mail); Zhi-Wei Lin (E-mail); Bala Rajagopalan (E-mail); Scott Bradner (E-mail)
Subject: Question on: Draft-aboulmagd-crldp-ason-ext-02.txt
Why does it actually have
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026 except that the right to
produce derivative works is not granted.
While the bala and zhi documents do not have that but instead
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026 [1].
If you were OK with the latter statement, pls send an email specifying
so to rfc-editor and iesg.
Also... it seems that the crldp by osama should reference the
G.7713.3 document, no? Or is that IMPLIED?
Same actually for zhi's document.
Thanks,
Bert