RE: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

By the way, the author (Aboulmagd) has in the meantime
informed the RFC-Editor that the "no derivitive work"
clause can be removed. So this doc now has the same
provisions as the on Bala adn Lin documents.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Bradner [mailto:sob@harvard.edu]
> Sent: vrijdag 24 januari 2003 15:15
> To: ewgray@graiymage.com; Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
> Cc: iesg@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational
> 
> 
> > However, unless
> > I'm severely confused (which is always possible), the 
> prohibition against
> > derivative works came from the ITU side of the fence,
> 
> the prohibition is more not used all that often - two main cases where
> is is
> 	1/ vendor work publish for the information of the community
> 	2/ republishing a standard from another SDO 
> 
> just like we would not want the ITU "fixing" an IETF standard w/o our
> input it seems a reasonable desire to not have the IETF "fix" an ITU
> (or ETSI etc) standard w/o their involvement
> 
> Scott
>