[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt

To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt
From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:41:01 -0500
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, iab@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
In-reply-to: <200301241915.h0OJFHK07829@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>

On Friday, Jan 24, 2003, at 14:15 America/Montreal, Thomas Narten wrote:

There are definitely procedural issues to consider.

Thomas,

Speaking for myself only, I don't think that creating more hard-and-fast
process is helpful.  IETF have got a lot of that already.  Creating more
does not seem like part of the answer.

Maybe you weren't proposing creating more process ?

Ran
rja@extremenetworks.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt
  - From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>

References:
- Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt
  - From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt
Next by Date: Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt
Previous by thread: Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt
Next by thread: Re: draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread