Re: Why MTA-level black listing bites [Fwd: NOTICE: mail delivery status.]

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> Return-path: <randy@psg.com>
> Received: from randy by rip.psg.com with local (Exim 4.12)
> 	id 18dBfe-00079O-00; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 07:59:38 -0800
> Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull)
> 	by rip.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
> 	id 18dBfd-00079H-00
> 	for randy@rip.psg.com; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 07:59:37 -0800
> Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org)
> 	by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
> 	id 18dBfa-000MSA-00; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 07:59:34 -0800
> Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
> 	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0RGH0J31262;
> 	Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:17:00 -0500
> Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176])
> 	by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0RGGKJ31250
> 	for <iesg@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:16:20 -0500
> Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
> 	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA18116
> 	for <iesg@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:55:03 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26])
> 	by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44724CE29
> 	for <iesg@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:58:32 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46])
> 	by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA16007;
> 	Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:58:32 -0500 (EST)
> Received: (from fenner@localhost)
> 	by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id HAA07253;
> 	Mon, 27 Jan 2003 07:58:31 -0800 (PST)
> Message-Id: <200301271558.HAA07253@windsor.research.att.com>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.5a/makemail 2.9d
> Errors-To: iesg-admin@ietf.org
> X-BeenThere: iesg@ietf.org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
> Precedence: bulk
> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,
> 	<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Id: <iesg.ietf.org>
> List-Post: <mailto:iesg@ietf.org>
> List-Help: <mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,
> 	<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
> Sender: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.8 required=5.0
> 	tests=FWD_MSG,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO
>   You can ask help@ to put you on a list of usernames that bypass SPEWS
> and all the other dubious checks.  I tried to argue that nobody's email
> should be subject to such aggressive checks but it's hard to argue with
> "but it has cut down spam complaints 72%".

a hydrogen bomb would reduce them 100%