Re: "IETF consensus" in IANA considerations [was Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational ]

To: narten@us.ibm.com, randy@psg.com
Subject: Re: "IETF consensus" in IANA considerations [was Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational ]
From: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:34:05 -0500 (EST)
Cc: braden@isi.edu, iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, kireeti@juniper.net, rja@extremenetworks.com
In-reply-to: <E18eGct-0000cB-00@roam.psg.com>

> and they meant the current 2434 definition

or they misread 2434 (or did not read 2434) and thought they knew 
what "IETF consensus" means

Scott

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "IETF consensus" in IANA considerations [was Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational ]
  - From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>

References:
- Re: "IETF consensus" in IANA considerations [was Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational ]
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>