Re: Status of draft-ietf-ipp-url-scheme-05.txt

[Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>]

...and I now see that _I_ have a discuss, but I can not find my discuss 
notes.

I also have comments from Allison and Thomas and Bill, possibly the 
same as Ned has.

I have no clue what my issue could have been. Possibly that Allison saw 
literal IPv6 addresses were used in the URL's and the question was what 
to do about it?

I don't know why this ended up on my table though, if not only because 
I deal with URI's in general, and maybe this IPv6 thing was "my 
problem". That is fine, but I want us to agree on it (what I am 
supposed to do that is).

   paf

On fredag, nov 8, 2002, at 19:35 Europe/Stockholm, 
ned.freed@mrochek.com wrote:

> OK, this is very strange. According to my notes this was last called 
> about a
> year ago and was on the IESG agenda around the start of the year. It 
> received
> very substantial pushback from a number of IESGers and a discuss note 
> was
> crafted. I have email from Bill, Thomas, and Allison regarding what 
> the note
> said.
>
> But I cannot find the ballot so I don't know who has the discusses. 
> The little
> ballot button doesn't show up in the datatracker. I also cannot find a 
> link to
> the ballot on the old internal status page -- apparently that function 
> is gone.
>
> In any case, the current version seems to address the various discuss 
> comments
> I have in hand. Secretariat, if you could find the ballot and let me 
> know who
> has discusses I'd appreciate knowing so it is clear who needs to check 
> for and
> clear their discusses. I assume at least Bill and Thomas do. And 
> please put
> this one on next week's agenda.
>
> Sorry to have to create a ruckus for what is really sort of a nothing 
> document,
> but there you go.
>
> 				Ned