Re: nit on the alt-abr document

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>]

In message <120641642.20030206120628@psg.com>, Alex Zinin writes:
>Harald-
>
>Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 7:24:16 PM, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>> nit: ABR is defined at first usage. ASBR is not defined.
>> suggest an RFC Editor note to expand at first usage.
>
>Below is my answer to Steve who brought up exactly the same
>question. Basically, "ASBR" is not a new term that this doc
>introduces. However, if this doesn't seem reasonable, I can
>add a note.
>

I think that the rest of the document is reasonably comprehensible to 
someone who understands the major concepts of OSPF, but doesn't know 
all the details.  Certainly, that describes me.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)