[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Experimental RFC to be: draft-stoica-diffserv-dps-01.txt

To: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: Experimental RFC to be: draft-stoica-diffserv-dps-01.txt
From: Jon Crowcroft <Jon.Crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 23:13:11 +0000
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, istoica@cs.berkeley.edu, hzhang@cs.cmu.edu, venkitar@labs.mot.com, jayanth@labs.mot.com, end2end-tf@ISI.EDU, Jon.Crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk
In-reply-to: Message from Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU> of "Mon, 10 Feb 2003 21:41:40 GMT." <200302102141.VAA02693@gra.isi.edu>

In missive <200302102141.VAA02693@gra.isi.edu>, Bob Braden typed:

 >>PS: Should this discussion be in public on the IETF list?  It's OK with me.

right.

hey, if its ok to do MPLS and NAT traversal, how come this is verboten?

its not like its an weapon  of mass destruction

 cheers

   jon

References:
- Re: Experimental RFC to be: draft-stoica-diffserv-dps-01.txt
  - From: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: Authentication and email
Next by Date: RE: Last Call: Definitions of Managed Objects for the SONET/SDH Interface Type to Draft Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Experimental RFC to be: draft-stoica-diffserv-dps-01.txt
Next by thread: Re: Experimental RFC to be: draft-stoica-diffserv-dps-01.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread