[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
eval for Feb 20 - udp-lite
This is a belated revision to Last Call comments.
draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-lite-01.txt
Technical Summary
This document describes the UDP-Lite protocol, which is similar to
UDP (RFC 768), but can also serve applications that in error-prone
network environments prefer to have partially damaged payloads
delivered rather than discarded. If this feature is not used, UDP-
Lite is semantically identical to UDP. UDP-Lite provides a checksum
with optional partial coverage. When using this option, a packet is
divided into a sensitive part (covered by the checksum) and an
insensitive part (not covered by the checksum). Errors in the
insensitive part will not cause the packet to be discarded by the
transport layer.
Working Group Summary
The Transport Working Group supported advancement of this specification.
There was Last Call dissent about two aspects: first, its original
plan of being a variant of UDP itself. The response was to develop
the protocol as a separate transport protocol, which has better properties
in general. Second, there were questions about the applicability. For
this, the debate was referred to the authors' more detailed conference
paper on audio use of errored data. The flexibility of UDP-Lite is not
for broad classes of applications, but the conclusion was that it has
utility for a significant class of cellular uses now and should be
advanced.
Protocol Quality
The protocol was reviewed for the IESG by Allison Mankin. There have
been implementations for a number of years and many experimental trials.
RFC Editor Notes:
RFC Editor, please replace "[RFC-768]" with "(RFC 768)" in the
Abstract.
RFC Editor, please add before the Copyright Notice a section headed
"IPR Notices", containing RFC 2026, Sections 10.4 (A) and 10.4(B)