Re: FW: IAB response to Robert Elz appeal

[Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>]

note that this is not the kind of appeal that can get re-appealed to the 
ISOC BoT - that is reserved for issues where the claim is that the 
actual documented process is broken (and the fix would be to change
the process document - i.e. rfc 2026)

Scott

----
>From iesg-admin@ietf.org  Wed Feb 19 17:20:15 2003
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
To: "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, "Bob Hinden" <hinden@IPRG.nokia.com>,
   latif.ladid@village.uunet.lu
Subject: Re: FW: IAB response to Robert Elz appeal 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:52:16 EST."
             <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B03240F1A@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:19:35 -0500
Sender: iesg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: iesg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: iesg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,
	<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <iesg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,
	<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

In message <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B03240F1A@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.
net>, "Bound, Jim" writes:
>Dear IESG,
>
>What is your response to this decision? You can appeal this appeal to
>ISOC.


We'll be discussing it on tomorrow's IESG call.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)