Re: Last Call: IANA Considerations for RADIUS to Proposed Standard

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>]

In message <200302241448.h1OEmurC026462@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>, Thomas Narten 
writes:
>> If I understand this draft correctly, it represents the most
>> pathetic and lame perversion of the IETF process I've ever seen.
>
>If you have something of substance to say, the above doesn't
>communicate it very well.
>
>I'm serious.

Glenn, that was my reaction, too.  I'm not sure what issue you're 
trying to raise.  BCP vs. Proposed?  That's the only thing I see.


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)