[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 56th IETF scheduling - Draft Agenda as of February 25

I agree... I think of EAP as primarily a security WG.

Donald

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven M. Bellovin [mailto:smb@research.att.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:44 AM
To: Dinara Suleymanova
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org; bofchairs@ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 56th IETF scheduling - Draft Agenda as of February 25 


Eep!  Or rather, eap!  It's bad to have eap conflicting with ipsp, 
though I can probably live with that; it's very bad to have it conflict 
with saag.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)