Re: FW: Request for BoF proposal.

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>]

In message <E18o7G2-000GLB-00@roam.psg.com>, Randy Bush writes:
>>> You had to have the AD approval for this BOF. We can not schedule your
>>> group without it.  And actually, the request came after the cut-off.
>> I think the request has merit, but I have a conflict of interest and 
>> shouldn't be the approving AD.
>
>it has ops spin, so i can proxy for you if you wish.  do they have active
>disucussion of a published draft on some mailing list?
>
They have drafts and a mailing list that was announced last time.  But 
the list has been pretty quiet.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)