Re: FINAL Agenda of the 56th IETF Meeting

[Dinara Suleymanova <dinaras@ietf.org>]

At 07:54 PM 2/27/03 +0100, Patrik Fältström wrote:

> On torsdag, feb 27, 2003, at 19:37 Europe/Stockholm, Dinara Suleymanova wrote:
>
> > Do I need here to react to these message?
> My suggestion is that you only react to AD's which explicitly ask for 
> something.
>
> If someone is screaming and you are worried, ping the AD.
Promise, I will do next time ....


>    paf
>
>
> > At 12:22 PM 2/27/03 -0600, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> > > LEMONADE counts twice. Does that help?
> > >
> > > Spencer
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC [mailto:paul.hoffman@vpnc.org]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:49 AM
> > > > To: Dinara Suleymanova; wgchairs@ietf.org; bofchairs@ietf.org;
> > > > iesg@ietf.org
> > > > Subject: Re: FINAL Agenda of the 56th IETF Meeting
> > > > Importance: High
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > At 11:50 AM -0500 2/27/03, Dinara Suleymanova wrote:
> > > > >Please take a look at the FINAL Agenda before we send it to the
> > > > >ietf-announcement.
> > > >
> > > > The only problem I see is that only half of the BOFs have
> > > > excessively-cute acronyms. I thought that our quota was higher than
> > > > that.
> > > >
> > > > --Paul Hoffman, Director
> > > > --VPN Consortium
> > > >