I re-read this, and it seemed a little curt. My apologies -- I was simply trying to inject a factoid into the stream of discussion (that there is a plenary slot scheduled for Phil) but the terseness may make it seem like I was having an issue with *which* plenary. No issue, just jetlag. Leslie. Leslie Daigle wrote:
Phil is scheduled to be on the IAB plenary -- a forum for open remarks. Leslie. Allison Mankin wrote:An open feedback would be good too - Harald would need schedule this in the plenary, or perhaps he already has...
In message <E18orOW-0001j9-00@psg.com>, Allison Mankin writes:The nomcom chair could be asked to talk about the feedback that was received on perceived IESG/IAB problems in general - I'd say there was some role confusion between the nomcom and the problem statement group on the part of folks who sent mail and attended the office hoursThat's a good idea, too -- some breakfast in San Francisco?I would hope the more general feedback (i.e. not about specific named people) would be given in a fully open and public forum, such was done by Ted T'so last year as part of his presentation during IESG Plenary. More open == better, IMHO. Ran
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reality:
Yours to discover."
-- ThinkingCat
Leslie Daigle
leslie@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------