Re: CORRECTION: Document Action: 'Terminology Used inInternationalization in the IETF' to Informational

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> FWIW, I think the document is far better than having nothing in this area.
> For instance, there was language in the charsets considerations document 
> that Ted Hardie's been working on that was just majorly confusing to 
> someone used to other terminology - and I pointed him to this document 
> rather than going into details.
> 
> John has a particular axe to grind (he wants the influence of the Unicode 
> Consortium on the world's internationalization efforts reduced), and is 
> grinding that axe pretty hard.
> 
> I didn't find the energy to step into the fight between John and Paul - 
> they're sufficiently opposed to each other that even when they seem to 
> everyone else to be saying the same thing, they both agree that they 
> disagree.
> 
> My previous efforts to generate IETF activity in the area (INTLOC BOF in 
> Salt Lake City) failed. And Paul is attempting to deliver something that 
> the community needs.
> 
> Where should we go from here?

i think i can help paf with a few very small tweaks and reach a good
compromise.  waiting to talk to paf.  then i will talk with jck.

randy