[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: how to deal with liaison statements

To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: how to deal with liaison statements
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:38:57 -0500
Cc: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, iab@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Mar 2003 18:42:00 EST." <E18tcKn-0000VG-00@roam.psg.com>

In message <E18tcKn-0000VG-00@roam.psg.com>, Randy Bush writes:
>> xml2itu?  oh marshall!
>
>uh oh!  this is actually viable.  one xml file produces i-d and liaison
>statement.  sick sick sick.
>

Especially if the liason statement version can have lots more 
boilerplate than even a modern RFC....

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)

References:
- RE: how to deal with liaison statements
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Prev by Date: RE: how to deal with liaison statements
Next by Date: Re: [mobile-ip] Last Call: Registration Revocation in Mobile IPv4 toProposed Standard
Previous by thread: RE: how to deal with liaison statements
Next by thread: Re: how to deal with liaison statements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread