Re: question on process

[Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>]

if its a normative ref than the termonology needs to be stds track
or BCP

imo

Scott

---
>From iesg-admin@ietf.org  Wed Mar 19 13:56:25 2003
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: "Iesg (E-mail)" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: question on process
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 19:54:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: iesg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: iesg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: iesg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,
	<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <iesg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:iesg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,
	<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

In ccamp we have this situation, 3 documents:
- a terminology document
- functioonal description for X
- protocol X 

They want the last two to be stds track.
And those two do normative reference to terminology document.
Does that mean that the terminology MUST be stds track too?
I thought it would be OK to have terminology be informational, no?

Thanks,
Bert