[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BGP as Draft vs. RFC 2385



Does this (leaving it as BGP specific and adding an AS)
sound good to SEC and TSV ADs?

--
Alex

Wednesday, March 19, 2003, 1:12:12 PM, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:


> --On 19. mars 2003 12:53 -0800 Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com> wrote:

>> In other words, TCP-MD5 as a separate security mechanism
>> taken out of the routing context looks behind and shouldn't
>> be pushed to along the STD track. However, when considered
>> within the routing context, it does make sense.

> Put an applicability statement in the document that says exactly this.